3 kingdom system and 3 kingdom system within the simple theory of life sciences. Since microorganisms were located in 1676, the simple theory of life sciences began to slowly shape 3 primary dividing lines. These dividing lines were very subtle and not noticeable, but on a careful scrutiny, they were very clearly, and had in fact formed 3 kingdom system and 3 kingdom system within the simple theory of life sciences. Simple theory regarding the technological life sciences belongs to 3 kingdom system on the whole. Classification of living things in theory circle.
The biological classification reflects the cognition process that person understand the living things. Within the 1750's, Linnaeus proposed to classify the living things regarding to their different life styles, and called the living things that should manufacture inorganic substances into their own nutrients as plants and called the ones that should not self-manufacture organic nutrients but directly or indirectly depend on plants for life as animals 8. Subsequent to Darwin's Origin of Species was published within the 1850s, the classification principle regarding the 3 kingdom system was slowly recognized by the biological workers. Till 1950s, people only then discovered there were some problems within the 3 kingdom system. In other words, microorganisms were discovered in 1676, but people did not regard them as living things till the 1950s, and had been complying with the 3 kingdom system theory.
Afterward, from the evolutionary perspectives, people began slowly to subdivide living organisms into six primary kingdoms based on the cellular morphology and structure, within the Monera, the Protista Protoctista, the Fungi, the Plantae, and the Animalia. Someone added the Virus too. However, this classification has not been accepted by biological scientists. Living things reflected in metabolic realities. Here, we should not involve in those discussions, and should not discuss what they should be, but make clean what they can be now regarding to the realities, sequential to do our own things.
Based on the experimental conclusions and realities that only the inorganic substances in ionic state should be absorbed by plants and the following generating mode of inorganic ions, etc. , we can look that there should be an opposite and untied relation between life and reason within the movement of substance cycle. Similarly, biological metabolism and substance cycle should also belong to an opposite and untied relation. Within the movement of substance cycle, if no the metabolic activity, the fabric state should not be destroyed and should not turn into another state to move. And the destruction of fabric state each time is done by microorganisms.
This is the experimental result and the reality, which cannot be denied. But shall look from the above table 1, within the theories regarding the biological metabolism and substance cycle we are applying now, there is almost no involvement of microorganisms, and microorganisms are unnecessary basically within the real application regarding the general theory. Moreover, the chemical substances within the inorganic world should enter directly into the plant body, and begin the biological cycle of substances. But when the substances withdraw from the cycle, they should also directly grow to the chemical substances. This means that these substances may be absorbed by plants repeatedly and begins to enter the next cycle.
That is, the substance cycle believed by our theory should operate freely without microorganisms, but on the contrary the microorganisms are unnecessary. Within the real application of our theory, they can be indeed somewhat always underfoot and interfering. If the microorganisms were responsible for the decomposition of pet remains regarding to the explanation of our theory, they should wait for this bite on the person body for dozens of years each time. Their patience is really good!. Therefore, the biological metabolism and substance cycle that we are applying at present belong to 3 kingdom system very obviously, that is an undeniable reality.
So some people said, Consequently the changing microbial world was located by scientists, the classification regarding the 3 kingdoms is still existed 9. Deep-seated reasons to isolate microbial metabolism from plant and pet metabolism. Because the microorganisms are somewhat always underfoot and interfering within the real application regarding the 3 kingdom system theory, the systematic and authoritative theory of biological metabolism regarded them as Generally speaking, there is no many sense 7 to the person metabolism, and thereby kicked them away. The reason that microorganisms suffered this kick is not so simply, it reflects that the 3 kingdom system theory is repulsive to microorganisms. The 3 kingdom system theory and the biology subsequent to microorganisms appeared are 3 different stages on the life of cognition, and the theories reflected by them belong to 3 different processes fundamentally, which should not be embodied and applied within the similar to theoretical framework.
May look from the table two embodied the real situations regarding the biological metabolism and substance cycle, the general 3 kingdom system theory has no roomfor microorganisms and not ever let them to join. In essence, consequently microbiology occupies more and more important location within the life sciences, it is incompatible and conflicting fundamentally with the current 3 kingdom system theory. Therefore, the current studies and exploration on microorganisms are putting another play, while each does things in his own method with the 3 kingdom system theory. Realities need interpreting life phenomenon with 3 kingdom system theory. Although the experimental conclusions already reflected the 3 stages regarding the fabric movement and the 3 states regarding the fabric movement are very clear, the frame regarding the 3 kingdom system theory should not hold the 3 stages and states regarding the fabric movement, and cause a cluttered situation of more good and fewer shelves.
In this situation, mostly there was no moving state regarding the substances chemicalized substances. On the surface, the products need to build their compulsory shelves. This surface phenomenon reflects a deep-rooted problem, that is the reason wants to move. We can look from most the establishment of new concepts and table 1, the substances reflected within the 3 kingdom system theory are static and dead, but the realities need the substances receiving component within the biological cycle to be living and move. That the products wanted to build their compulsory shelves shows, in fact, that they need to live and move.
Microorganisms need to be liberated. Under the fetter regarding the general 3 kingdom system theory frame, it is an indisputable fact that the microorganisms play a bit role and are relegated to the sidelines within the biological metabolism. Mostly that the autotrophic microorganisms are classified into producers within the greatest simple theory, it is seriously inconsistent with the facts, experimental conclusions and methodology theory. The discovery of microorganisms caused to shape the 3 categories of living things, which are microorganisms, plants and animals. And this classification is recognized by biological workers without any objection.
However, the category microorganism wavers between plants and animals, most similar to plants and also similar to animals. based on the experiment conclusions and synthesis in this paper, the microorganisms' nutrition mainly returns from chemical substances, and the nutrition of plants and animals returns from chemicalized ones, and their nutrient source is very different from plants and animals. Therefore, the view that shall display most pet and plant like characteristics cannot reflect the microorganisms' reality to obtain nourishment, but caused a confusion with the nourish source of plants and animals. At the similar to time, that the microorganisms' nutrient source is different from plants and animals should place forward another problem, telling us something wrong within the classification principle to classify the living things regarding to their different life styles, and called the living things that should manufacture inorganic substances into their own nutrients as plants and called the ones that should not self-manufacture organic nutrients but directly or indirectly depend on plants for life as animals, due to the fact that it is only microorganisms can directly contact with or face the inorganic and organic substances, not plants and animals. Thus, it returns out the following 3 categories of living things in accordance with the classification principle regarding the nutrient source generally recognized by the public:.
Microorganisms: directly obtain nourishment from inorganic and organic substances;. Plants: indirectly obtain nourishment from inorganic substances;. Animals: indirectly obtain nourishment from plants or organic substances. Such a classification seems nothing new at first glance, but there exists 3 primary differences from the previous classifications: it was based on the bodies that the general theory classified living things into microorganisms, plants and animals; Linnaeus' classification was based on the nutrient source. Consequently our classification is based on the nutrition source too, there is a best difference between direct and indirect.
This spot is very important, due to the fact that it gives the greatest effective basis for us to explain and resolve the different contradictions. This is a reflection of contemporary studies and realities, and very clear, there is no artificial classification. The development and reality of contemporary microbiology, mostly a large many facts regarding the functions regarding the normal microorganisms in intestines and dietary fiber has formed a large-scale non-residential clusters, grow to very difficult to explain the different phenomena with the 3 kingdom system theory, force us to raise a query on it, due to the fact that if the digestive substances should be directly transformed into pet substances, the intestinal microorganisms and dietary fiber should indeed be no many sense, but the facts regarding the intestinal microorganisms and dietary fiber are very important to person health. Moreover, the contemporary studies and realities have clearly reflect that vitamins are the essential nutrients of person body, but the vitamins in person and pet bodies are not synthesized by person or pet bodies themselves, and little of them rely on the intestinal microorganisms while some are supplied from food. This fact that a component of vitamins in person body is supplied by the intestinal microorganisms is in conflict with the 3 kingdom system theory, due to the fact that it has got into trouble, revealed the dishonesty regarding the general metabolism theory, broke the original tranquility regarding the 3 kingdoms which the technological life sciences rely on, and caused the technological theory system appearing a contradictory hubbub of most self-affirmation and self-denial in accordance with the general laws of development of things.
Unfortunately, in front of this ironclad fact, no one has a suspicion whether there exists some problems on the bottom regarding the 3 kingdom system theory, but attempt to abide by the frames regarding the 3 kingdom system theory and just take the contemporary studies conclusions and reality to patch up the general theory, creating the more contemporary studies conclusions and discoveries, the more obvious conflicts between the general theory and the realities, and the more adding insult to injury regarding the general theory broke through the original frame of a+0=c. Various factors reflected that the category microorganism is no substitute for other living things; mostly the microbial function to directly contact with inorganic and organic substances is unique. Without it, plants and animals should have nothing, and should not live. Therefore, we need to release a thorough investigation regarding the contradictions within the general theory of life sciences, need to pay attention to the microbial role within the substance transformation, and consequently try to explore the 3 kingdom system theory, sequential to reflect all studies conclusions and realities within the life sciences look Table 2. Matter wants to move and microorganisms need to be liberated, this is an all-important subject to be faced and solved urgently within the simple theory of life sciences.
Try transiting to 3 kingdom system theory component two the realities of substance cycle. Due to the different understanding of in vivo and in vitro, and also classing the function of chloroplasts below autotrophic microorganisms, biological metabolism and substance cycle should have the following different changes. First, let us begin from the inorganic ions which shape the plant substances initially. Generating mode of inorganic ions. All the inorganic substances, for example phosphorus, nitrogen, carbon, potassium, calcium, etc.
, should grow to an ionic state, and then should be absorbed by plants. Otherwise, these substances should not generate their potential life to move into the plant body. There are 3 ways to make inorganic substances into the ionic state: one is physical-chemical mode for example rays, lightning, storms, waves, waterfalls, etc. , and another is biochemical mode. Most of them have their rationality.
1 Physical-chemical mode. This is the mode that went through from inorganic substances to organic within the ancient times, and now it is still playing a role. There exists 3 different forms in this mode: one is the plant photosynthesis, and another is the reaction of removing electrons by autotrophic microorganisms. By the restoration of chloroplasts, their function was classed below the head of autotrophic microorganisms only in this method it can make sense in theory. Moreover, whether the ATP production within the photoreaction or the carbon assimilation within the dark reaction, most of them are inseparable from the effect of coenzymes or enzymes, and inextricably linked with microorganisms.
Reaction to remove electrons by autotrophic microorganisms. Within the process of inorganic substances transformed into organic, to remove their electrons is usually completed by autotrophic microorganisms. Thus, we need to understand the biochemical mode to generate all the inorganic ions as the function of autotrophic microorganisms or the reactions of their removing electrons. It is very slow that the ions produced by physical-chemical mode grow to organic substances, with which mode to generate microorganisms had gone through higher than two billion years, and the rapid transformation from inorganic substances to organic happened only subsequent to the birth of microorganisms. So, considering most the primary mode for plants to assimilate ions and sequential to be convenient for our discussion, we need to adopt the normal biochemical mode promoted by autotrophic microorganisms, that is correspondent with the whole theory discussed by us.
Beginning and end points of biological cycle of substances. Are there the beginning and end points in biological cycle of substances?. According to the general biological chain theory, the substance transformation is linked each other and interlocking between the so-called decomposers, producers and consumers, and there should not be the beginning and end points. Within the general definition of biological cycle of substances, it also spoke about that is a continuous process that plants absorb air, water, inorganic nutrients in soil and synthesize them into plant organic matter, the plant organic reason is synthesized into pet organic reason subsequent to pet absorption, and the remains of plants and animals, when they died, are decomposed into inorganic substances and return to air, water, soil 11. This definition is approximately the similar to as the substance cycle reflected by the general biological chain theory, which has no beginning and end points.
But on a careful deliberation, we should be aware that the general biological chain is closed, and implies a logic that the former need to be converted completely into the latter, otherwise, the substance cycle should be interrupted. But in fact, the organic substances decomposed by microorganisms decomposers should not be absorbed totally by plants producers, plants should not be converted totally into animals consumers, and also the low-level consumers for example herbivores should not be consumed by the high-level ones for example carnivores. At the every position regarding the substance cycle, most regarding the substances should return to the inorganic state at any time. This kind regarding the cycle situation with mini top and large bottom illustrates there should be its beginning and end points, otherwise, it should break itself in operation, and should not continue. Furthermore, prior to the organic reason came into being, consequently there was a geochemical cycle in nature due to the fact that regarding the solar imbalance, atmospheric movement, precipitation and rivers, it had been belonging to a relative static inorganic world as opposed to the biogeochemical cycle of substances.
It was only subsequent to higher than two billion years that the inorganic world began to slowly generate microorganisms through physical-chemical reaction, and thereby the inorganic substances had been launched in large scale from their static state and accelerated biogeochemical cycle of substances. Where are the beginning and end points?. Now that the plant and pet bodies can not related directly to the physical substances and only the inorganic substances in ionic state should be absorbed by plants, so the beginning spot regarding the substances cycle in biological world should be the inorganic substances in ionic state, and the starter regarding the biological cycle of substances should be autotrophic microorganisms, due to the fact that the procedure of removing electrons is completed by them within the reality the physical-chemical reaction also has its contribution. Only the inorganic substances lost some electrons can hold a potential life for their movement to the organic phytosynthesis. In the biological cycle of substances, the result of heterotrophic microorganisms' effect is inverted against autotrophic microorganisms', that is the restoration of organic substances.
Consequently there should be some pet decomposition one-stage and two-stage decomposition during the restoration, their final end is still the restoration, and returns the organic substances to the inorganic state. The restored inorganic substances are no different from other inorganic ones not involving in circulation and impossible to be absorbed directly by plants. Therefore, the essential function of heterotrophic microorganisms is to obtain the substances involving within the circulation return to their start, and thus it should make the end spot regarding the biological cycle of substances. So from the direct kinetic life angle, in essence, the biological cycle of substances starts from autotrophic microorganisms and ends with heterotrophic microorganisms. Thereby, within the biological cycle of substances, the substances are the base, and microorganisms are the key.
According to this section and all the above discussions, we shall display the whole process regarding the biological cycle of substances with a simple diagram:. Please trfer to of biological cycle of substances. The explanations of biological cycle of substances are as follows:. Cleared distant the closed state. The Diagram of biological cycle of substances cleared distant theimplicit logic that the substances should be transformed totally between the so-called decomposers, producers and consumers.
Whether the inorganic substances in ionic state or plants should drop out from the cycle at any time, and return to the inorganic state. Autotrophic and heterotrophic creatures should be classified respectively. By the classification of autotrophic creatures autotrophic microorganisms and plants and heterotrophic creatures heterotrophic microorganisms and animals, highlighted the equal status of autotrophic and heterotrophic microorganisms, and gave expression to playing their promoting role within the process of phytosynthesis and restoration or bio-fixation and bio-release. Various elements came into the unity of opposites. Plants and animals, autotrophic and heterotrophic microorganisms, phytosynthesis and restoration, inorganic and organic, biological catabolism and substance cycle, all of them came into a relationship of unity of opposites.
In the general theory, it is emphasized there should be no synthesis without decomposition catabolism and anabolism, which obviously refers to the metabolism within the pet body, and should not be a universal law regarding the substance cycle in biosphere. But within the biological cycle of substances, the opposite side of phytosynthesis should not be the decomposition, but restoration. So here adjusted the phytosynthesis and restoration as the 3 sides regarding the unity of opposites. It also wants to indicate that animals' decomposition and composition are the secondary procedures during the biological cycle of substances, which not ever belong to the similar to conceptual position regarding the phytosynthesis and restoration. We need to distant clarify, within the biological cycle of substances; the phytosynthesis is primary, that is no phytosynthesis, no restoration.
It is just opposite to that the animals' decomposition is primary, that is no decomposition, no composition. Created animals dependent on plants. Within the process regarding the restorations of plants, animals were not treated as the consumers paralleling to or even higher than plants, but treated like a branch deriving from plants, and belonged to a kind of creatures deriving from plants. Person and animals are subject to plants within the substance transformation, that is independent of our subjective shall but is decided by their heterotrophic nature. It conforms to the simple theory and reality that person and animals are based on plants.
Did not reflect the pet high consumption. As animals were classified into the category of plants, and only the primary categories were expressed, this diagram only reflected the decreased consumption that animals were derived from plants, did not reflect their high consumption.