Dear Mick,In your books you suggest the cycle lengths of about 8 weeks or thereabouts 12 in some cases which i have used with no problems and have had good conclusions over the years. But of late I have seen cycles on the net as long as seven months, a year and on one occasion that was suggested that a guy stayed on for almost a year and a half! howcome has the length of cycles grown so many and are they safe? Confusing to speak the fewest I'd say. If you do not mind me asking what is your opinion?ListerHi Lister,The scary thing about this is that your question has indeed fact and that cycle's of 12 months and 18 months are I am afraid around and in use at this time. The brief answer in my opinion is that I am saddened to look it consequently I did predict it a little years ago. There are so many reasons as to howcome this has happened and two of those was initiated by a little of these impatient nob cheeses that basically cannot wait and should have the conclusions like NOW! With this impatience we only should look return to their diet and gear intake.
You should ask that I did not mention training? Well there was good reason for this. I have seen so many different cycles over the years from impatient men and women who have basically place ALL regarding the emphasis on the no. of gear that they place in regardless regarding the consequences and as the gear got weaker and weaker, their sources got fewer and fewer with no real questions asked about where the gear came from within first place. So very many of them were forced to increase cycle length within the vain hope that this should compensate ever decreasing gear position quality. This has obviously proliferated into a fad that I am afraid has seen some fatal consequences this final year past and more.
Bodybuilders who were spoke about to have died of direct steroid use at one time had, nine times out of ten, created other problems that were related to the pressures of training, diet and so forth - the ins and outs of bodybuilding pressures. Pressures of training regimes and strictly controlled diets channelled bodybuilders into other forms of stress relief that took distant the monotony, the repetitiveness of similar to old similar to odds etc. I myself was guilty of this at one time and most of us if we admit it should speak the same. So to summarize I should speak together with the greatest utmost seriousness that to use steroids based on tried and tested SAFE methods for years on years and to have no problems with an 8-10 week cycle as an example only to change that proven method to push one's body into a minimum 12 month cycle is beyond me and should be beyond you. I have knowledge of that we can only progress by trial and error, test and record, self experimentation etc, I have no argument with that but when the changes are SO vast as in a 10 week cycle to just to a 52 or even worse a 78 WEEK one is absolutely f ing out of this world on the MAKE ME UNDERSTAND scale mostly when people are dying like a direct result! FFS these total nob heads that announce these cycles do so not only risking their own lives but that regarding the ignorant that look for out and view them.
I ask that anyone please think about the vast changes that such time length increases can bring within the shape of damage and even prior to that the problems of primary shut-down such cycle lengths can give. My The god ponder regarding the dick shrinkage Your balls should be pea volume and any chance of a hard on should be most probably be where the erection goes backwards! I shudder to think. Stay where you have knowledge of you can be safe. Let these twats get on with their year long ON cycles. Question all and everything until YOU have knowledge of that you can be sure and look safe.
Final thing is most important in my opinion: do NOT be worried what the IN crowd does, be bothered what YOU do. Mark my words, seriously due to the fact that your life should depend on the decisions you make subsequent to reading these stupid shit length cycles.
No comments:
Post a Comment